Submission Guidelines
2007 Global
Awards for Excellence in BPM & Workflow
Winners Announced February 25, 2008
Pictures from Awards
Ceremony
Submission Deadline: December 20, 2007
Please DO:
Please use the
Submission Template
- This is a WinWord Document with helpful guidelines and
preformatted with page size and headings.
Do not change the page sizes or margins in
document template. Page Size: Executive with 1"
margins all round.
Submissions must be in
English.
Make sure that all information in any graphic or
table is legible when printed in black/white and
fits in the column width of 5 inches. Normal font is
Bookman Old Style.
Remember that very colorful screen captures and
other graphics do not reproduce well in
black/white.
Complete the online entry form
here . You
should
complete and submit this form now , and then send your case study
(zipped) as a
separate email attachment later to awards07@bpmfocus.org
identifying it by the same Submission Filename
on the entry form which is the name of the company whose case study is being submitted.
Please DO NOT:
Do not
send in PDF format. No hard copy or faxed
submissions will be accepted.
Do not
include a Contents Page, Header or Footer data,
or logo watermarks. Only page numbers at the
bottom of the page are required.
Do not
exceed 25 pages inclusive of any images, graphs
or tables. Concise and readable is better. Aim
for 6-18 pages.
Submission Notes
The
submission must address the installation from
the perspective of the USER—in other words,
avoid vendor-oriented press-release type
submissions.
We do
want to know about the technology, products,
vendors and suppliers, but they should not be
"hyped."
The
nominator and nominee can be from the same
company, and vendors and integrators may
nominate customers. There is no limit to the
number of workflow installations that you may
nominate. Use the required format headings as
the chapter headings in your submission.
Each
section should be about one to three pages long
with appropriate subheadings for clarity
(numbered and bullet-point paragraphs are
acceptable where appropriate). Where possible,
inserted graphics should be based on vector
graphics (rather than JPEG or Bitmap images). Be
especially careful that diagrams created in
applications such as Visio are "locked."
IMPORTANT NOTE: We recognize that certain
information on projects is considered sensitive
and/or proprietary. The Judges undertake to keep
this information confidential in both the Awards
announcements and any publications unless we
have your permission. We want you to feel
confident that you can submit truly compelling
case studies without compromising your
competitive advantage. Please indicate on your submission document any information you consider confidential.
Winners and finalists receive
additional recognition by having their case studies published in the
annual volume of
Excellence in Practice
by Future Strategies Inc.
View 2006 and past winners here.
READ THESE VALUABLE HINTS!
Connie Moore, Forrester, Vice President and leading judge
of the awards for many years has some hints on what the judges look for in a winning entry.
Ø The
judges are turned off by PR hype - VERY important. Please do write from the USER's
perspective, not from a Vendor's perspective.
Ø Pay
attention to the fact these awards are based on three main criteria: Innovation ,
Implementation , and Impact across the categories of Business, Process and
Technology.
Ø We're
looking for something that pushes the technology in new areas, has created a
major change in a positive way for the organization and has clearly demonstrated
major benefits.
Ø We're
looking for something that stands out from the crowd, something exemplary for
your particular industry. How have you moved the goalposts for your industry?
View 2006 and past winners here.
READ HOW THE
PREVIOUS WINNERS MOVED THEIR COMPETITIVE GOALPOSTS!
By studying these winning submissions, you will get a
better understanding of what the judges find appealing, not only in content, but
also the way that the information is presented. Many a promising case study has
lost significant advantage because of the inappropriate way in which it was
submitted. Even though many entries are submitted by vendors on behalf of their
customers, please write from the user perspective. Remember, the judges are
turned off by product hype.
Free Sample Chapters here ...